I love the looks of the new Hunter but I question the reason for the laser grips on a 'hunting' pistol? I would opt for a standard set of grips and save some money!
At typical handgun hunting ranges (50 yds max), I'm thinking the laser would help place the shot better than the open adjustable sights... IMO
Ping Ping said:
I'd like to know how their getting away with not compensating it in the .460 chambering. Clarks has stated this to be essential to the durability of the gun.
Johnny Rowland mentioned that the compensator on the Clark Custom System was essential to keeping the barrel locked up longer than without... thus reducing the stresses placed on the frame/slide. Maybe Wilson Combat went with one of those "Squared" firing pin stops to add more resistance to the slide, in essence increasing the lockup time enough not to batter the hell out of the frame??? Or they could be using a thicker "shock-buff" :biglaugh:
I'd love to own a 1911 patterned gun natively chambered for the .460 Rowland, and I'd love to someday own a Wilson Combat as well... this would kill two birds with one stone... but DANG!!! You see the sticker price on these guns (glad to see the .460 costs the same as a 10mm)???
I think I'll wait for my Clark Custom Conversion and save up for a Wilson Combat (in .45 auto of course), or maybe even an Ed Brown.